Skip to content

In ur data, bein unreprezentativ.

June 5, 2010

After two people recommended Ben Goldacre‘s Bad Science to me within the space of a few hours, I decided to spend some of my leftover book tokens on it. Having now finished it, I can wholeheartedly recommend it in turn: it’s very good, highly informative, and Goldacre does a nice line in withering put-downs.

On page 254, there is a footnote. It reads:

I’d be genuinely intrigued to know how long it takes to find someone who can tell you the difference between ‘median’, ‘mean’ and ‘mode’, from where you are sitting right now.

As it happens, I was sitting on the sofa in J’s front room, watching the rerun of Sky’s Going Postal adaptation with him and Rhiannon. A quick survey established that all three of us knew the difference, providing an answer to Goldacre’s question of ‘about four seconds’.

Naturally, based on this data I can only conclude that everyone in the world knows the difference between the three kinds of average. Because 100% of our sample did! (Extrapolating from the same sample, you could also conclude that one-third of the population is Quaker and that two-thirds will study to Masters level.)

Ridiculous, isn’t it? And yet things on a similar scale of silliness get into the papers every day.

One Comment leave one →
  1. June 6, 2010 9:43 pm

    When I was at school, I always used to wonder what the point of having three different averages was. Then I got to uni and learned that there are even more and spent most of first year trying and failing to get them straight in my head.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s